By Samer Skaik, Jeremy Coggins and Anthony Mills
Statutory adjudication has been enacted throughout Australia on a state-by-state basis. The original enacting legislation may be broadly divided into two models which have become known as the East Coast and West Coast models. The East Coast model adjudication scheme – which is operational in NSW, Victoria, Queensland, Tasmania, ACT and South Australia – has in recent times come under much criticism for failing to facilitate determinations of sufficient quality with respect to large and/or complex payment claims. By carrying out a thorough desktop study approach whereby evidence is garnered from three primary sources – government commissioned consultation papers, academic publications and judicial decisions – this paper reviews this criticism and therefrom distils the key factors influencing the quality ofadjudication of large and/or complex claims in Australia.
Read the full paper here
Similar Posts:
- A PROPOSED ROADMAP TO OPTIMISE THE ADJUDICATION OF COMPLEX PAYMENT DISPUTES IN AUSTRALIA
- How should adjudicators deal with expert reports in Australia?
- Forthcoming: My four book chapters on Australia within “International Contractual and Statutory Adjudication” Book
- Does Statutory Adjudication fall short in dealing with complex claims in Australia?
- The Mechanism of the Australian Statutory Adjudication in a Nutshell