Construction Law, Contract Administration

Why Multi-Party Arbitration Should Have a Satisfactory Regime in International Construction

By Dr. Chandana Jayalath

The term construction contract involves not only contractors and employers but also consultants from different disciplines, sub contractors, investors, insurers, bankers, and so on. The international nature lies in both the facts that the parties come from different countries and so is the source of supply of works, goods and services. The forms of contract also differ upon for whom the work is being carried out. …

Construction Law, Contract Administration

Limitations and Hypothesis Underlying the Use of Interpretation Rules in Construction Contracts Revisited

By Dr. Chandana Jayalath

The whole idea of interpretation is to dig out the intention of the parties had in their minds at the time they entered into the contract. There are rules of interpretation that have been based on common sense connected with the ordinary life. It is the philosophy of language that provides material for interpretation. In contract law, it is now well-established that the context is important in interpreting documents, which is often referred to by the label ‘matrix of facts’, ‘surrounding circumstances’, or ‘factual background’. Courts must place itself in thought in the same position as the parties to the contract were placed, in fact, when they made it. Accordingly, those involved in contract interpretation should not try to make a bargain for the parties, but instead seek to understand what the parties meant by reference to the words which they chose. …

Construction Law, Contract Administration

Dealing with Suspension Claims

By Dr. Chandana Jayalath

Suspension usually occurs on a construction project when an employer requires a contractor to temporarily stop work on all or a portion of the project. Contractually, the contractor shall suspend the progress on the engineer’s written notice if it is only provided for in the contract, due to contractor’s default, due to climatic conditions, on safety reasons, necessary for proper execution of work or in excepted risks. A mandatory requirement is cast on the contractor to give a written notice of his intension to claim for any additional cost or time within a specified period from the date of receiving the engineer’s order to suspend the work. This clause specifically permits the engineer to authorize extension of time or payment of extra cost, whose decision is final and binding. …

Construction Law, Contract Administration

Dealing with Construction Claims – the Gulf Way

By Dr. Chandana Jayalath

The topicality of claims has been accentuated by the fact that contractors keep chasing extras, and clients keep pursuing cost savings, particularly in lump sum contracts where the majority has been locked into. The trend is that claims specialists are reported mobilize on such contracts even before construction commences, to locate loopholes in the documentation and look for lapses in the process of contract administration that will altogether facilitate ‘juicy’ claims. This situation has jerked the entire Gulf region into awareness on the importance of good contract administration and the supreme importance of documentation. …

Construction Law, Contract Administration

Amendment, Deletion or Silence – Which One is Better?

By Dr. Chandana Jayalath

Any standard form of contract is a generic product applicable under ‘typical’ circumstances subject to amendments in the Particular Application section in order to cater locally specific project requirements where necessary. Importantly, the Contractors therefore recognize the differences and know how to act upon those amendments in the contract. All in all, everyone ‘knows the deal’ if presented with a standard form. The other significant advantage is that the wording of many standard forms has been subject to interpretation over the years by courts. But at least with standard forms both employers and contractors know roughly where they are standing. There are always those who wish to go down the bespoke route but even in bespoke contracts there are vast chunks of texts copied straightway from standard forms. Even though on most occasions what the standard form gives with one hand the amendments take back with the other. …

Construction Law, Contract Administration

Claims on Prolongation Costs

By Dr. Chandana Jayalath

It is common practice that time extension claim comes before the claim on prolongation costs. Once an extension of time has been granted, the evaluation of the additional prolongation costs is often related to the period between the contract completion date and the extended completion date. Prolongation cost is also calculated on time related preliminaries. The author contends that this line of thinking is illogical. …

Construction Law, Contract Administration

Understanding the Generality of Variation Clauses and the Variety of Broad Interpretation that Exists under FIDIC Based Contract Modalities in Gulf

By Dr. Chandana Jayalath

Majority of construction contracts in the Gulf region maintain the principle features of the FIDIC forms of contract, yet there are many subtle changes from the FIDIC forms of contract. These changes will eventually imbalance the even risk allocation between the parties. Many contracts drafted in one sided language biased towards the clients are a result of cut and paste exercise, for instance, sometimes; there is no provision for price escalation and variations exceeding 10 or 15 per cent. The message to contractors entering into contracts on the basis of these forms is to review them very carefully without being fooled into thinking they are simply the FIDIC versions. …

Contract Administration

Contractor’s Entitlement under Fidic Contact 4th Edition

Contractor’s Claim for increased cost of material due to unforeseen conditions resulting major revisions can be admissible under clauses 12.2, 6.3, 40.1, 51.1 and 6.4 (FIDIC 4th Edition)

I have a typical case with me and would like have opinion cum guidance from other members.

Contractor has suffered financial losses due to
01. Delays due to presence of existing u/g services (clause 12.2 & 6.3).
02. Consequently proposed building was relocated (51.1)
03. Consequently Structural Engineer requires soil investigation. Soil investigation findings resulted total revamp of Structural Design (6.4).
04. Consequently, work suspended for about 3 months (40.1).
05. In the mean time cost of reinforcement bars increased substantially.
06. Revised Structural Drawings issued with provision of two additional floors (51.1)
07. Contractor had procured Steel for original scope, and cut & bent steel is ready for foundation & upto ground floor. But due to design changes it cannot use it.
08. Moreover, due to substantial increase in the reinforcement quantity, contractor is forced to purchase at higher prevailing price.
09. Contractor has notified in a timely manner, of his intention of claim for all above noted consequences and finally submits his claim (along with contemporary evidences) for the additional costs only.
10. Cost Consultants rejects the claim with conclusion that there is no merit in Contractor’s claim for the increase in price of steel under clause 12.2, 51.1, 6.3 & 40.1
11. Note that contractor is not entitled to claim for any increase or decrease in the cost of materials under clause 70.1.

Are there any decided cases on similar claims?

Construction Law, Contract Administration

Pay When Paid: What does it mean?

1. The Readers of this journal must be very familiar with the phase “pay when paid”. From time to time, it has been raised by main contractors as a defence for not paying its sub-contractors. A classic “pay when paid” clause is found in clause 11(b) of the Standard Form of Sub-Contract for use when the sub-contractor is nominated under the Standard Form of Building Contract drawn up by The Hong Kong Institute of Architects, The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (Hong Kong Branch) and The Society of Builders, Hong Kong (commonly known as the “Green Form”). …

Construction Law, Contract Administration

Recovery of Unabsorbed Head Office Overheads in a Contract Prolongation

By Dr. Chandana Jayalath

A contractor’s overheads are normally covered by the income of the business as a whole and, where the completion of one contract is delayed, the contractor may claim to have suffered a loss arising from the diminution of the income from the contract and hence, the turnover of the business; but the general running costs of his business continue to be expended. Were it not for the delay, the contractor’s workforce would have had the opportunity of being employed on another contract, with the result that it would have contributed towards the overhead costs during the overrun period. Also, if he can show that the staff, who would otherwise have been gainfully employed, had to devote time to dealing with the disruption or delay, he may have a claim for that too. …

Scroll to Top