The World Bank, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), and other multilateral development banks (MDBs) impose the use of Dispute Avoidance and Adjudication Boards (DAABs) in the projects they fund for several critical reasons, all aimed at ensuring the successful and efficient delivery of large-scale infrastructure projects in developing countries. …
Why the World Bank Use DAABs: A Shield for Development ProjectsRead More »
Delays in construction and infrastructure projects are almost an inevitability. But what happens when multiple delays hit at once, and some are the client’s fault while others lie with the contractor? This is the tricky terrain of concurrent delay, a concept that can lead to significant disputes over extensions of time and financial compensation.
…
Decoding Concurrent Delay: The SCL Protocol and Employer ResponsibilityRead More »
Construction projects are inherently complex, often fraught with variables that can lead to disagreements, claims, and disputes. When a conflict arises, it can be costly in terms of time, money, and professional relationships. While a traditional approach might be to head straight to litigation, it is often more effective to leverage alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods like negotiation and mediation. The key to success lies in understanding and managing three core tensions that exist in every dispute.
…
Navigating the Tensions: A Guide to Mediation in Construction DisputesRead More »
A fundamental question often arises at the heart of dispute resolution planning: should a dispute be decided by a single individual or a multi-member tribunal? This choice carries profound implications for speed, cost, expertise, and the ultimate robustness of the decision. This post delves into the arguments for each approach across various dispute resolution mechanisms, offering insights to inform this critical decision.
…
The Crucial Choice: One or Three Decision Makers in Construction DisputesRead More »
Construction projects are complex undertakings, breeding grounds for disagreements that can escalate into costly, project-derailing disputes. For decades, the industry has sought better ways to resolve conflicts without resorting to lengthy arbitration or litigation. Enter the Dispute Board (DB), a project-based, real-time resolution mechanism designed to keep projects moving and relationships intact.
However, the power of a Dispute Board decision is not absolute. Its real-world teeth depend heavily on a crucial, often overlooked factor: the governing law of the contract. This article dives into the world of Dispute Boards, exploring how they function, how their decisions are enforced, and how the choice of jurisdiction can make or break their effectiveness, especially when compared to the statutory adjudication process. …
Dispute Boards in Construction: Enforcement and Governing LawRead More »
Unforeseen events and potential issues are almost inevitable in construction and infrastructure projects. How these challenges are identified, communicated, and addressed can significantly impact a project’s success, cost, and timeline. The FIDIC 2017 suite of contracts places a strong emphasis on proactive risk management and dispute avoidance, with the Early Warning Notice (EWN), specifically under Sub-Clause 8.4 [Advance Warning], being a cornerstone of this philosophy.
This post dives into the rationale and utility of Early Warning Notices under FIDIC 2017, exploring what happens if these provisions are not complied with, and outlining the responsibilities of all parties when such a notice is issued. …
The Critical Edge: Why Early Warning Notices Matter in FIDIC 2017Read More »
In the complex world of construction and large-scale infrastructure projects, effective dispute resolution is paramount to keeping ventures on track and budgets intact. While traditional methods like litigation and arbitration have their place, the rise of Dispute Boards (DBs) offers a proactive and often more efficient alternative. These independent bodies aim not just to resolve disputes, but, crucially, to manage and even prevent them from escalating, acting as an integral part of project delivery. …
Beyond Battles: How Dispute Boards Transform Construction Conflict into CollaborationRead More »
The seemingly straightforward governing law clause in any contract holds immense power, acting as the legal compass that guides the interpretation and enforcement of an agreement. While its fundamental purpose—to specify which legal system will apply in a dispute—remains constant, its practical application, particularly in dispute resolution forums like adjudication and arbitration, presents a fascinating array of challenges and jurisdictional distinctions. This post demonstrates how governing law truly operates across different legal systems. …
Governing Law in Contracts: Navigating the Nuances of Jurisdiction and PracticalitiesRead More »
Disputes are an inevitable byproduct of complex projects, involving multiple parties, intricate contracts, and high stakes. At the heart of managing these conflicts, often with a heavy and unenviable burden, stands a key figure: the Engineer, Contract Administrator (CA), or Project Manager (PM).
Their role, as defined by various standard forms of contract, is often multifaceted, requiring them to be simultaneously technical experts, project leaders, financial custodians, and, crucially, initial dispute resolvers. It’s a tightrope walk where impartiality is expected, but practical realities often tug them towards one side. …
The Challenging Role of the Engineer/CA/PM in Construction Dispute ResolutionRead More »
Construction projects, with their intricate contracts, multiple stakeholders, tight deadlines, and complex technicalities, are fertile ground for disputes. When disagreements arise, traditional litigation can be a protracted, expensive, and relationship-damaging ordeal. This is where mediation steps in as a powerful and increasingly preferred alternative.
Mediation, at its core, is a flexible, confidential, and voluntary process where a neutral third party, the mediator, assists disputing parties in reaching a mutually acceptable settlement. Unlike arbitration or litigation, the mediator does not impose a decision but rather facilitates communication, clarifies issues, explores options, and helps the parties find common ground.
…
How Mediation Builds Bridges in Construction Projects?Read More »
The world of construction contracts, especially the globally recognized FIDIC suite, can often feel like navigating a complex labyrinth. Clauses, entitlements, claims, termination rights, dispute boards… it’s a lot to keep track of, even for seasoned professionals. But what if you could demystify these crucial topics, one engaging conversation at a time, right from your headphones?
We’re thrilled to announce the launch of the CMGuide Podcast Series!
This isn’t just another dry lecture. We’re bringing you in-depth, practical discussions designed to unpack the intricacies of construction contracts, with a special focus on the FIDIC Suite of Contracts. …
Level Up Your Construction Contract Knowledge: Introducing the CMGuide Podcast Series!Read More »
Construction projects, by their very nature, are susceptible to disruptions – events that hinder the regular and efficient progress of work, leading to a loss of productivity and increased costs. While delays extend the project timeline, disruption impacts the efficiency of work within that timeline, often without necessarily extending the overall completion date. Successfully navigating disruption claims is crucial for contractors to recover legitimate losses and for employers to understand their contractual obligations. This post explains disruption claims under two prominent FIDIC (Fédération Internationale Des Ingénieurs-Conseils) contract editions: FIDIC 1999 and FIDIC 2017, highlighting their differences, how to establish entitlement, and methods for quantifying associated costs or Extension of Time (EOT).
…
Mastering Disruption Claims: Insights from FIDIC 1999 and 2017Read More »
